TWO POINTS IN THE THEORY OF STATISTICAL INFERENCEBARNARD G. A.BRIT. J. PHILOS. SCI. 1972, Vol 23, Num 4, pp 329-331Article

R.A. Fisher ― a true Bayesian?BARNARD, G. A.International statistical review. 1987, Vol 55, Num 2, pp 183-189, issn 0306-7734Article

Statistics and OR : some needed interactionsBARNARD, G. A.The Journal of the Operational Research Society. 1992, Vol 43, Num 8, pp 787-795, issn 0160-5682Article

Comparing the means of two independent samplesBARNARD, G. A.Applied statistics. 1984, Vol 33, Num 3, pp 226-271, issn 0035-9254Article

Pivotal models and the fiducial argumentBARNARD, G. A.International statistical review. 1995, Vol 63, Num 3, pp 309-323, issn 0306-7734Article

Some remarks on pivotal models and the fiducial argument in relation to structural models. RejoinderFRASER, D. A. S; BARNARD, G. A.International statistical review. 1996, Vol 64, Num 2, pp 231-236, issn 0306-7734Article

The problem of misplaced control limits. Discussion. ReplyALWAN, L. C; ROBERTS, H. V; FISK, P. R et al.Applied statistics. 1995, Vol 44, Num 3, pp 269-278, issn 0035-9254, 28 p.Article

Comment. Good's replyBARNARD, G. A; GOOD, I. J.Journal of statistical planning and inference. 1990, Vol 25, Num 3, pp 437-440, issn 0378-3758Article

A new probability model for determining exact P-values for 2×2 contingency tables when comparing binomial proportions. DiscussionRICE, W. R; HILL, I. D; BARNARD, G. A et al.Biometrics. 1988, Vol 44, Num 1, pp 1-22, issn 0006-341XArticle

The rights and wrongs of control charts. Discussion. ReplyCAULCUTT, R; PUZEY, I; SMITH, T. M. F et al.Applied statistics. 1995, Vol 44, Num 3, pp 279-306, issn 0035-9254Article

Tests of significance in theory and practiceJOHNSTONE, D. J; BARNARD, G. A; LINDLEY, D. V et al.Statistician (London. Print). 1986, Vol 35, Num 5, pp 491-504, issn 0039-0526Article